ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024
A within-subject voxel-wise constant-block partial least squares correlation method to explore MRI-based brain structure-function relationship.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The brain structure-function relationship is crucial to how the human brain works under normal or diseased conditions. Exploring such a relationship is challenging when using the 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) functional dataset which is temporal dynamic and the structural MRI which is static. Partial Least Squares Correlation (PLSC) is one of the classical methods for exploring the joint spatial and temporal relationship. The goal of PLSC is to identify covarying patterns via linear voxel-wise combinations in each of the structural and functional data sets to maximize the covariance. However, existing PLSC cannot adequately deal with the unmatched temporal dimensions between structural and functional data sets. We proposed a new alternative variant of the PLSC, termed within-subject, voxel-wise, and constant-block PLSC, to address this problem. To validate our method, we used two data sets with weak and strong relationships in simulated data. Additionally, the analysis of real brain data was carried out based on gray matter volume hubs derived from sMRI and whole-brain voxel-wise measures from resting-state fMRI for aging effect based on healthy subjects aged 16-85 years. Our results showed that our constant-block PLSC can detect weak structure-function relationships and has better robustness to noise. In fact, it adequately unearthed the true simulated number of significant and more accurate latent variables for the simulated data and more meaningful LVs for the real data, with covariance improvement from 16.19 to 41.48% (simulated) and 13.29-53.68% (real data), respectively. More interestingly in the real data analysis, our method identified simultaneously the well-known brain networks such as the default mode, sensorimotor, auditory, and dorsal attention networks both functionally and structurally, implying the hubs we derived from gray matter volumes are the basis of brain function, supporting diverse functions. Constant-block PLSC is a feasible tool for analyzing the brain structure-function relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.