ReviewCureus2024
Proton Pump Inhibitor Usage in Urban vs. Rural Intensive Care Units: A Narrative Review of Implications for Standardization of Care.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intensive care unit (ICU) patients frequently require and benefit from stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) using proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Despite recognized benefits, PPIs are overutilized in patients who do not have high-risk factors predisposing them to clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding (CSGIB), including mechanical ventilation and coagulopathy. This overuse increases the risk of adverse effects associated with PPIs. Several urban healthcare systems have created educational initiatives aimed at reducing PPI usage in patients who do not meet recommendations or who are outside the period for serious risk of CSGIB. However, there was no available literature exploring PPI use or educational trends in rural hospitals. This situation presents an opportunity to investigate the disparities in PPI use between rural and urban healthcare settings. This narrative review aimed to assess current data on PPI usage in both urban and rural critical care environments, and to appraise existing practices, ultimately identifying gaps in current literature and informing future guidelines. With these evaluations, this review intended to provide a comprehensive overview of current PPI prescribing practices in the ICU and improve patient care across diverse healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.