ReviewCureus2024
Heat Generation and Pain Assessment in Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Drilling for Implant Placement: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of reticulated surgical guide vs. dynamic navigation to prevent periodontal tissue overheating during piezocision using thermography: a randomized pilot clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Trial
- Heat generation and histological analysis of peri-implant bone cutting using piezoelectric surgery for implant removal: an in vitro study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Article
- Early Placement of Patient-Specific One-Piece Drill-Free Fully Digital Designed Dental Implants: A Feasibility Study.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2025Article
- The Impact of Implant Surface Modifications on the Osseointegration Process: An Overview.Cureus · 2025Review
- Effects of Repeated Use and Sterilization on the Wear of Zirconia Implant Drills: A SEM-Based Analysis.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of new technologies in implant dentistry has led to the introduction of piezosurgery, which utilizes ultrasonic vibrations for micrometric and selective bone cutting. It is hypothesized to reduce trauma to bone tissue, thereby potentially improving the healing process compared to traditional drilling methods. This systematic review examines the differences in heat generation and pain perception between piezosurgery and conventional drilling techniques for dental implant placement. An extensive review of literature was performed using various databases, including PubMed via MEDLINE, EBSCO, and Google Scholar. Out of an initial pool of 2,279 articles, nine studies met the predefined inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis following title and abstract screening and subsequent full-text evaluation. The quality of the selected studies was rigorously assessed using the Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0), Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I), and Quality Assessment Tool for In Vitro Studies (QUIN) tools. Data pertaining to thermal effects and postoperative pain associated with piezosurgery relative to conventional drilling protocols were collected. The results indicated a significant reduction in postoperative pain with piezosurgery; however, the technique was associated with higher intraoperative temperatures during osteotomy. These findings provide valuable insights into the potential benefits and limitations of piezosurgery in dental implant procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.