Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39539812›Full record

ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2024

Artificial intelligence efficiently predicts gastric lesions,

Ruixin Yang, Jialin Zhang, Fengsheng Zhan, Chao Yan, Sheng Lu, Zhenggang Zhu, Kang An, Jing Sun, Yingyan Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Artificial intelligence models in predicting lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta -analysis.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ruixin YangDepartment of General Surgery of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, and Shanghai Key Laboratory for Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Jialin ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Gubei Branch, Shanghai 201103, China.
Fengsheng ZhanCollege of Information, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 201418, China.
Chao YanDepartment of General Surgery of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, and Shanghai Key Laboratory for Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Sheng LuDepartment of General Surgery of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, and Shanghai Key Laboratory for Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Zhenggang ZhuDepartment of General Surgery of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, and Shanghai Key Laboratory for Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Kang AnCollege of Information, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 201418, China.
Jing SunDepartment of Gastroenterology of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Yingyan YuDepartment of General Surgery of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, and Shanghai Key Laboratory for Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Medical images have been increased rapidly in digital medicine era, presenting an opportunity for the intervention of artificial intelligence (AI). In order to explore the value of convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms in endoscopic images, we developed an AI-assisted comprehensive analysis system for endoscopic images and explored its performance in clinical real scenarios. Methods: A total of 6,270 white light endoscopic images from 516 cases were used to train 14 different CNN models. The images were divided into training set, validation set and test set according to 7:1:2 for exploring the possibility of discrimination of gastric cancer (GC) and benign lesions (nGC), gastric ulcer (GU) and ulcerated cancer (UCa), early gastric cancer (EGC) and nGC, infection of Results: Among the 14 CNN models, EfficientNetB7 revealed the best performance on two-category of GC and nGC [accuracy: 96.40% and area under the curve (AUC)=0.9959], GU and UCa (accuracy: 90.84% and AUC=0.8155), EGC and nGC (accuracy: 97.88% and AUC=0.9943), and Hp and noHp (accuracy: 83.33% and AUC=0.9096). Whereas, InceptionV3 model showed better performance on predicting metastasis and no-metastasis of perigastric lymph nodes for EGC (accuracy: 79.44% and AUC=0.7181). In addition, the integrated analysis of endoscopic images and gross images of gastrectomy specimens was performed on 95 cases by EfficientNetB7 and RFB-SSD object detection model, resulting in 100% of predictive accuracy in EGC. Conclusions: Taken together, this study integrated image sources from endoscopic examination and gastrectomy of gastric tumors and incorporated the advantages of different CNN models. The AI-assisted diagnostic system will play an important role in the therapeutic decision-making of EGC.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceCNNearly gastric cancerEndoscopic imagesgastric ulcer

Identifiers

PMID39539812
PMCPMC11555197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.