Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39539789›Full record

ArticleJournal of survey statistics and methodology2024

Using Auxiliary Information in Probability Survey Data to Improve Pseudo-Weighting in Nonprobability Samples: A Copula Model Approach.

Tingyu Zhu, Laura J Gamble, Matthew Klapman, Lan Xue, Virginia M Lesser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of survey statistics and methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tingyu ZhuTingyu Zhu is a Graduate Student in the Department of Statistics at the Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Laura J GambleLaura J. Gamble were Graduate Research Assistants at the Survey Research Center, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Matthew KlapmanMatt Klapman were Graduate Research Assistants at the Survey Research Center, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Lan XueLan Xue are Full Professors in the Department of Statistics at the Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7764-8564
Virginia M LesserVirginia M. Lesser are Full Professors in the Department of Statistics at the Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.

Funding

Measurement error correction approaches to wearable device-based measures of physical activity and self-reported measures of dietary intake in obesity and type 2 diabetes researchR01DK132385 · NIDDK · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI TEKWE, CARMEN D. · 2022 to 2025
$2.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK132385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While probability sampling has been considered the gold standard of survey methods, nonprobability sampling is increasingly popular due to its convenience and low cost. However, nonprobability samples can lead to biased estimates due to the unknown nature of the underlying selection mechanism. In this article, we propose parametric and semiparametric approaches to integrate probability and nonprobability samples using common ancillary variables observed in both samples. In the parametric approach, the joint distribution of ancillary variables is assumed to follow the latent Gaussian copula model, which is flexible to accommodate both categorical and continuous variables. In contrast, the semiparametric approach requires no assumptions about the distribution of ancillary variables. In addition, logistic regression is used to model the mechanism by which population units enter the nonprobability sample. The unknown parameters in the copula model are estimated through the pseudo maximum likelihood approach. The logistic regression model is estimated by maximizing the sample likelihood constructed from the nonprobability sample. The proposed method is evaluated in the context of estimating the population mean. Our simulation results show that the proposed method is able to correct the selection bias in the nonprobability sample by consistently estimating the underlying inclusion mechanism. By incorporating additional information in the nonprobability sample, the combined method can estimate the population mean more efficiently than using the probability sample alone. A real-data application is provided to illustrate the practical use of the proposed method.

Indexed as

Ancillary variableInclusion probabilityPanel samplePseudo likelihoodSample likelihood

Identifiers

PMID39539789
PMCPMC11555207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.