ArticlePaediatrics & child health2024
A mixed-methods exploration of the Real-Time Virtual Support pathway Child Health Advice in Real-Time Electronically in Northwestern BC.
Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the implementation of a provincial virtual paediatric consulting service, Child Health Advice in Real-Time Electronically (CHARLiE), integrated into the paediatric on-call schedule in Northwestern British Columbia. Methods: Healthcare providers in Northwestern British Columbia responded to a survey (n = 72) and participated in focus groups (n = 35) and key informant interviews (n = 4) to share their experiences engaging in a healthcare model that incorporated virtual paediatric consultants in lieu of in-person local paediatrician coverage over a 28-month period. Survey data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Themes were generated from a qualitative descriptive approach to focus groups and key informant interview transcripts. Results: 96.1% of survey respondents who had used CHARLiE rated it as 'good' or 'very good' in the provision of overall support, while 77.6% reported that CHARLiE improved access to paediatric care. Focus group and key informant interview participants valued CHARLiE's timely, dedicated virtual bedside assessments of patients; collegiality and professionalism; amelioration of local paediatrician burnout; prevention of unnecessary transfers; and offloading of indirect patient care tasks. Video support improved provider confidence and appeared to improve caregiver trust. Suggested improvements included addressing technological barriers, enhancing providers' knowledge of local resources, and enabling continuity of care. Participants identified that virtual care does not replace on-the-ground specialist care. Conclusions: Participants valued CHARLiE's 24/7, timely, and collegial video support. While maintaining a full complement of on-the-ground paediatricians remains the goal for some rural communities, dedicated virtual support provides access to paediatric care in smaller communities, thereby improving health equity for children in British Columbia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.