SynthesisFrontiers in pediatrics2024
A systematic review of surgical and interventional radiology procedures for pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Therapeutic role of venous sinus stenting in pediatric IIH: evidence review for clinical practice.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Pooled it
- Migratory Venous Sinus Stenosis After Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: a Single-Center Case Series.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension: prognostic value of obesity and cerebrospinal fluid pressure.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Clinical and MRI Features in Pediatric Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Focus on Optic Nerve ADC Values.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Fulminant idiopathic intracranial hypertension mimicking Chiari I malformation in a pediatric patient: diagnostic value of MRI and promising outcomes with venous sinus stenting.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Review
- Intracranial venous pressures and endovascular outcomes in pediatric patients with cerebral venous sinus stenosis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Optic Nerve Sheath Fenestration for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. A Subgroup-Focused Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.ASIDE internal medicine · 2025Article
- Awareness of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in children among pediatricians in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is defined as elevated intracranial pressure and consequent symptoms (mainly headache and visual deterioration) occurring in the absence of secondary causes. Surgical and interventional radiology procedures should be considered for refractory IIH and mainly include cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion techniques, optic nerve sheath fenestration (ONSF), and venous sinus stenting (VSS). Our study aims to review the current literature on the application of these techniques in clinical practice. Methods: A systematic literature review on the surgical and interventional radiology treatment of IIH was conducted, focusing on ONSF, VSS, and CSF diversion techniques. According to PRISMA guidelines, all reports published in PubMed in the last 30 years (1993-2023) were considered, and among 722 papers, 48 were included in the present study, resulting in a total study population of 454 children or adolescents (11 months-17 years old). Results: Among 454 patients, 193 underwent an invasive approach, divided into CSF diversion (115/193), ONSF (65/193), VSS (11/193), cranial subtemporal decompression (8/193), and internal cranial expansion (9/193). Sixteen of the 193 patients (8%) required reintervention due to relapsing symptoms or surgical complications, particularly those who underwent CSF diversion. Furthermore, 9/115 required shunt revision due to shunt obstruction or malfunction. We extracted data on the outcome of each procedure: of the 193 patients, 71 experienced a positive outcome with symptom resolution or improvement, while 27 demonstrated a negative outcome. Discussion and conclusions: Severe and refractory cases of IIH are eligible for invasive treatments. CSF diversion is the most frequently used technique, despite its high failure risk and need for reintervention. ONSF has shown good results in terms of outcome and safety, particularly in children with visual symptoms. VSS is the most recent approach, indicated in children with stenosis of the venous sinus. In our study population, VSS demonstrated good results in terms of symptom resolution and need for reintervention, but its use remains limited to a few centers. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, PROSPERO (CRD42024504244).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.