Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39539751›Full record

SynthesisSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine2024

Predictors of Satisfactory Surgical Outcome in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (Review).

A V Stanishevskiy, G V Gavrilov, M N Radkov, B G Adlejba, D V Svistov

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A V StanishevskiyNeurosurgeon, PhD Student, Department of Neurosurgery; Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov, 6 Academician Lebedev St., Saint Petersburg, 194044, Russia.
G V GavrilovMD, DSc, Associate Professor, Lecturer, Department of Neurosurgery; Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov, 6 Academician Lebedev St., Saint Petersburg, 194044, Russia; Head of the Department of Neurosurgery No.2; Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, 6-8 L'va Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russia.
M N RadkovNeurosurgeon, Department of Neurosurgery; Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov, 6 Academician Lebedev St., Saint Petersburg, 194044, Russia.
B G AdlejbaNeurosurgeon, PhD Student, Department of Neurosurgery; Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov, 6 Academician Lebedev St., Saint Petersburg, 194044, Russia.
D V SvistovMD, PhD, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Neurosurgery; Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov, 6 Academician Lebedev St., Saint Petersburg, 194044, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is a widespread neurodegenerative disease of the elderly. If not treated surgically early, it results in a severe decrease in quality of life and disability. According to current clinical Russian and foreign guidelines the candidates for CSF shunting procedures are selected based on the results of invasive tests, though treatment outcomes are not always optimal. At the same time, in the last decade there have been published a number of studies on promising noninvasive diagnosis and prognosis of the surgical treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus based on neuroimaging findings.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal Fluid ShuntsHydrocephalus, Normal PressureHumansPrognosisQuality of LifeTreatment Outcomeidiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalusinvasive diagnosisneuroimagingpredictortap test

Identifiers

PMID39539751
PMCPMC11556049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.