SynthesisFrontiers in microbiology2024
Insights into
Synthesis in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns and Predictors inMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Article
- Burden, clinical impact, and primary antimicrobial resistance profiles of Helicobacter pylori infections in Cameroon: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Tegoprazan-Amoxicillin Dual Therapy for Clarithromycin-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Article
- MicroRNA-Mediated Regulatory Networks inBiochemistry research international · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: This systematic literature search was performed using the appropriate search syntax after searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases between May 2015 and December 2023. Statistical analysis was performed using Pooled and random effects model in Results: A total of 7,768 articles were retrieved. After a thorough evaluation, 155 studies (by 178 reports) were finally eligible for inclusion in this systematic review and meta-analysis. According to the results, the majority of studies (178 reports from 43 countries) assessed clarithromycin susceptibility, with a pooled prevalence of 33.3% and high heterogeneity between studies ( Conclusion: This study highlights the critical challenges of macrolide resistance in treating Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero; CRD42024557749.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.