ArticleInternational journal of fatigue2025
Observation and modeling of potential sub-threshold damage growth mechanism for nitinol in ultra-high cycle fatigue.
Article in International journal of fatigue, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Assessment of Two Nitinol Fatigue Datasets to Support Cardiovascular Medical Device Durability.Journal of testing and evaluation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fatigue fracture of small nitinol components commonly used in medical devices is currently dominated by the initiation and/or growth of small cracks at non-metallic inclusions preceding conventional fatigue crack growth. Therefore, an understanding of the threshold and growth of small cracks is critical to inform fatigue performance of devices. In this paper, we conduct rotary bend fatigue experiments of nitinol wire to 2 billion cycles, measure the inclusion from which the crack initiated, and calculate the stress intensity threshold. Inclusion size is compared to the size of a unique feature observable with a scanning electron microscope which appears as a smooth area surrounding the inclusion and only on specimens that fractured after > 10 million cycles. The hypothesis presented is that the smooth feature around the inclusion is the growth of a small crack which continues until it reaches a size large enough to cause conventional fatigue crack growth. Relating inclusion size to that of the smooth feature creates a damage curve that can be written as a function of cycles to fracture. This damage curve may be useful to estimate the critical size of the largest allowable defect based on the design life and applied loading of the nitinol component.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.