ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024
Factors Affecting Outcomes and Complications of Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study of 110 Patients.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of clinical outcomes of triple-strand braid vs conventional quad-strand hamstring grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament injury poses a major effect on the quality of life of patients. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains the mainstay of treatment. Purposes: To (1) test for the correlation of patients' characteristics such as body mass index (BMI), age, smoking status, and postoperative infrapatellar numbness with the subjective outcome of primary ACLR and (2) investigate whether postsurgical complications can be related to the studied patients' characteristics. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Demographic data and operational notes from patients who underwent primary ACLR at the institute between 2011 and 2022 were extracted. Patients' surgical outcomes were evaluated subjectively using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Pre- and postoperative scoring were completed at postoperative follow-up in December of 2022, patients completed both the IKDC and the KOOS questionnaires. Patients were asked to rate their knee function out of 10 before and after surgery. This rating was based on the patients' self-assessment of their functional ability without the use of a formal instrument. Knee function was assigned as better, worse, or the same through a comparison of patients' reported scores before and after surgery. Results: Male patients comprised 108 (98.2%) of the total cohort, the mean ± SD age at the time of surgery was 27.92 ± 7.39 years, and BMI was 26.54 ± 3.89. The mean follow-up time was 48.92 ± 27.99 months. Most patients did not need postsurgical intervention (n = 97; 88.2%), while 4 (3.6%), 7 (6.4%), and 2 (1.8%) needed revision, debridement, or both, respectively. The mean IKDC score and KOOS, respectively, were 74.37 ± 20.17 and 85.50 ± 14.83. Patients' BMI had a significant effect on IKDC score (74.68 ± 20.0; Conclusion: This study showed that higher BMI and infrapatellar numbness negatively affect the subjective outcomes after primary ACLR. Older age at the time of primary ACLR was associated with a higher likelihood of surgery in the contralateral leg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.