Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39539674›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Shell Constraints on Evolutionary Body Size-Limb Size Allometry Can Explain Morphological Conservatism in the Turtle Body Plan.

Guilherme Hermanson, Serjoscha W Evers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Guilherme HermansonDepartment of Geosciences University of Fribourg Fribourg Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6917-1938
Serjoscha W EversDepartment of Geosciences University of Fribourg Fribourg Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2393-5621

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Turtles are a small clade of vertebrates despite having existed since the Late Triassic. Turtles have a conservative body plan relative to other amniotes, characterized by the presence of a shell and quadrupedality. This morphology is even retained in strong ecological specialists, such as sea turtles, which are secondarily adapted to marine locomotion by strong allometric scaling in their hands. It is possible that the body plan of turtles is strongly influenced by the presence of the shell, acting as a constraint to achieving greater diversity of body forms. Here, we explore the evolutionary allometric relationships of fore- and hindlimb stylopodia (i.e., humerus and femur) with one another as well as their relationship with shell size (carapace length) to assess evidence of constraint. All turtles, including Triassic shelled stem turtles, have near-isometric relationships that do not vary strongly between clades, and evolve at slow evolutionary rates. This indeed indicates that body proportions of turtles are constrained to a narrow range of possibilities. Minor allometric deviations are seen in highly aquatic sea turtles and softshell turtles, which modified their shells by bone losses. Our allometric regressions allow accurate body size estimations for fossils. Several independent sea turtle lineages converged on maximum sizes of 2.2 m of shell length, which may be a biological maximum for the group.

Indexed as

allometrybody sizemorphological constraintpredictionsstylopodiaturtles

Identifiers

PMID39539674
PMCPMC11557996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.