Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39539672›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2024

Reported roles of care partners in a specialized weaning centre-perspectives of patients, care partners, and health care providers.

L Istanboulian, A Gilding, L Hamilton, T Master, S Bingler, M Hill, S Isani, S Kazi, S Coppinger, K Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

L IstanboulianDaphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Faculty of Community Services, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
A GildingMichael Garron Hospital, Toronto East Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
L HamiltonMichael Garron Hospital, Toronto East Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
T MasterMichael Garron Hospital, Toronto East Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
S BinglerMichael Garron Hospital, Toronto East Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
M HillMichael Garron Hospital, Toronto East Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
S IsaniMichael Garron Hospital, Toronto East Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
S KaziMichael Garron Hospital, Toronto East Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
S CoppingerMichael Garron Hospital, Toronto East Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
K SmithMichael Garron Hospital, Toronto East Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

AHRQ HHS R18 HS029356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Care partners are individuals chosen by a person with an illness to support their care during hospitalization. Patients with persistent critical illness have longer than average critical care admission and often other conditions including dysphagia, communication vulnerability, severe physical deconditioning, the need for an artificial airway, and difficulty weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation. Family presence has been identified as important for patients experiencing persistent critical illness in specialized weaning centers. Despite this, the role of care partners in clinical settings for patients with persistent critical illness has not been fully characterized, particularly from the perspectives of patients, care partners, and health care providers. The aim of this study was to gain insights into the roles of care partners during persistent critical illness from the perspectives of patients, care partners, and health care providers. Methods: We used qualitative descriptive methodology including semi-structured interviews and content analysis. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Included participants ( Results: Participants across all groups described care partner roles that included physical, mental health, cognitive, social, and spiritual support of the patient, including the perceived role of safeguarding the multiple dimensions of care for the patient who is experiencing persistent critical care in specialized care settings. Discussion: The results of this study are being used to co-design, implement, and evaluate a sustainable care partner program that is acceptable, appropriate, and feasible to implement in clinical settings where the care of patients with persistent critical illness occurs. Reporting method: Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ).

Indexed as

care partnerscritical & intensive carepatient engagementpersistent critical illnesssafety

Identifiers

PMID39539672
PMCPMC11557519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.