Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39539659›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Are tinnitus burden and tinnitus exacerbation after cochlear implantation influenced by insertion technique, array dislocation, and intracochlear trauma?

F Everad, R L Beck, A Aschendorff, A K Rauch, Leonie Fries, S Arndt, M C Ketterer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

F EveradDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
R L BeckDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
A AschendorffDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
A K RauchDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Leonie FriesDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
S ArndtDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
M C KettererDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although numerous studies suggest that cochlear implantation (CI) generally alleviates the overall burden of tinnitus, certain patients experience tinnitus exacerbation following CI. The exact cause of this exacerbation is still uncertain. This prospective study aimed to investigate whether cochlear trauma, resulting from scalar dislocation of the electrode array, affected postoperative tinnitus intensity, tinnitus burden, and speech perception. Additionally, the influence of CI insertion technique, insertion depth, insertion angle, and cochlear morphology on postoperative tinnitus was assessed. Methods: We evaluated 66 CI recipients preoperatively at 2 days, 4 weeks, and 12- and 24-months following surgery. Digital volume tomography was employed to document scalar position, insertion depth, and cochlear morphology postoperatively. Speech perception was analyzed using Freiburg monosyllables. The tinnitus burden was evaluated using the tinnitus questionnaire, while the tinnitus intensity was quantified using a visual analog scale. Results: Study results pertaining to tinnitus intensity and burden did not reveal a significant difference in elevation regarding scalar position and dislocation after CI surgery compared to preoperative tinnitus levels. However, dislocation was only identified in four patients, and scala vestibuli insertions were observed in two patients. Comparing preoperative and 1-year postoperative outcomes, CI was noted to substantially reduce the tinnitus burden. When the speech processor was worn, the tinnitus intensity was significantly diminished. In comparison to round window (RW) insertion, the insertion technique cochleostomy (CS) did not exhibit a significant difference or a trend toward increased tinnitus intensity. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that CI significantly decreases the tinnitus burden. The observation implies that the electrical stimulation of the auditory pathway, facilitated by wearing the speech processor, significantly reduced the tinnitus intensity. The incidence of dislocations and scala vestibuli insertions has declined to the extent that it is no longer feasible to formulate statistically significant conclusions.

Indexed as

anatomycochleacochlear implantpsychometrytinnitus

Identifiers

PMID39539659
PMCPMC11557313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.