ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Structure-function relationship of dynorphin B variants using naturally occurring amino acid substitutions.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dynorphins (Dyn) represent the subset of endogenous opioid peptides with the highest binding affinity to kappa opioid receptors (KOPrs). Activation of the G-protein-coupled pathway of KOPrs has strong anticonvulsant effects. Dyn also bind to mu (MOPrs) and delta opioid receptors (DOPrs) with lower affinity and can activate the β-arrestin pathway. To fully exploit the therapeutic potential of dynorphins and reduce potential unwanted effects, increased selectivity for KOPrs combined with reduced activation of the mTOR complex would be favorable. Therefore, we investigated a series of dynorphin B (DynB) variants, substituted in one or two positions with naturally occurring amino acids for differential opioid receptor activation, applying competitive radio binding assays, GTPγS assays, PRESTO-Tango, and Western blotting on single-opioid receptor-expressing cells. Seven DynB derivatives displayed at least 10-fold increased selectivity for KOPrs over either MOPrs or DOPrs. The highest selectivity for KOPrs over MOPrs was obtained with DynB_G3M/Q8H, and the highest selectivity for KOPrs over DOPrs was obtained with DynB_L5S. Increased selectivity for KOPr over MOPr and DOPr was based on a loss of affinity or potency at MOPr and DOPr rather than a higher affinity or potency at KOPr. This suggests that the investigated amino acid exchanges in positions 3, 5, and 8 are of higher importance for binding and activation of MOPr or DOPr than of KOPr. In tests for signal transduction using the GTPγS assay, none of the DynB derivatives displayed increased potency. The three tested variants with substitutions of glycine to methionine in position 3 displayed reduced efficacy and are, therefore, considered partial agonists. The two most promising activating candidates were further investigated for functional selectivity between the G-protein and the β-arrestin pathway, as well as for activation of mTOR. No difference was detected in the respective read-outs, compared to wild-type DynB. Our data indicate that the assessment of affinity to KOPr alone is not sufficient to predict either potency or efficacy of peptidergic agonists on KOPr. Further assessment of downstream pathways is required to allow more reliable predictions of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.