ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy2024
Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Alternative and complementary medicines are currently experiencing a real boom worldwide, especially among cancer patients who are looking to improve their physical and mental well-being. Objectives: To provide an overview of the use of traditional treatments and dietary supplements by cancer patients and to assess the impact of these approaches on cancer care. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at the oncology day hospital of a Tunisian medical centre. Data were collected from February 1 to March 30, 2022. Results: In the study population, the prevalence of complementary medicine use was 71%; users were predominantly female, and average age was 54 years. Herbal medicine was most commonly used (69.7%); animal-derived products, diet, massage therapy, and dietary supplements were also common, with percentages ranging between 20% and 40%. Cupping therapy (12.4%) and mind-body therapies (such as rokia charia and physical activity; 10%) were noted to a lesser extent. Of the plants identified, the most frequently consumed was Conclusions: The survey revealed a significant prevalence of alternative medicine use, which requires careful attention and further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.