ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy2024
Piloting a Hospital Pharmacy Performance Model in the Face of Province-Wide Implementation of Activity-Based Funding in Quebec Health Care Centres.
Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the face of province-wide implementation of activity-based hospital funding in Quebec, a need arose to effectively measure pharmacists' contributions along the patient care trajectory and to enable pharmacy benchmarking using valid performance indicators. Objectives: A 3-phase project was initiated to measure the performance and impact of pharmacists and pharmacy departments. Phases 2 and 3, described here, focused on gradually implementing, in various health care centres, the priority indicators selected in phase 1. Methods: The project involved multiple committees overseeing the implementation, data collection, analysis, and documentation of 18 performance indicators. Specific tools were developed to facilitate data collection and encourage pharmacists' participation. A feedback survey was used to document pharmacists' experiences. Results: Substantial data were gathered over 3 years (2017 to 2020), involving 358 pharmacists from 6 health care centres. The overall contribution rate to the daily data collection from front-line pharmacists was 55%. The feedback survey revealed that, of the various communication tools used to promote the project, in-person events were better perceived by the front-line pharmacists than online tools. Of the 183 respondents to the survey, most (94%, Conclusions: Despite challenges, progress was made in defining relevant indicators, adjusting the list generated during phase 1, and reaching a consensus on 16 indicators. Stakeholders expressed interest, emphasizing the importance of documenting pharmacists' activities. The project has laid the foundation for demonstrating the value of pharmacists along the patient care trajectory and measuring pharmacy departments' performance. However, more integrated technological solutions are needed for province-wide implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.