ArticleBJUI compass2024
Integrated enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in radical cystectomy for bladder tumour-A retroprospective study.
Article in BJUI compass, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unintended consequences of antibiotic practices: the relationship between bowel preparation, prolonged prophylaxis, and ileus after radical cystectomy.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Article
- Enhanced recovery after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a prospective observational case -control study.BMC urology · 2026Observational
- Specialized Nursing-Led Interventions for Bladder Cancer Management: A Scoping Review of Evidence and Clinical Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- The application of ERAS Protocol in Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy combined with Cutaneous Ureterostomy and its impact on postoperative recovery.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Erratum.BJUI compass · 2024Article
- Integrated enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in radical cystectomy for bladder tumour-A retroprospective study.BJUI compass · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2024
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a patient-centerd, evidence-based approach to improve postoperative outcomes. The protocol involves multidisciplinary collaboration and standardisation of perioperative interventions. ERAS has shown positive results in reducing hospitalisation and complications. Methods: The study conducted in the Department of Urology was a retro-prospective study. It included an ERAS cohort group of 47 patients, studied prospectively from May 2021 to May 2023. These patients were compared to a historical cohort of 47 consecutive patients who underwent radical cystectomy with traditional care before the ERAS pathway was implemented. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included perioperative management, time to recovery milestones and complications. Results: Implementation of ERAS pathway for radical cystectomy was associated with reduced hospital LOS (mean LOS 16.19 ± 2.53 days vs. 10.26 ± 3.33 days 7 days; Conclusion: In conclusion, the implementation of the integrated approach facilitates a more efficient recovery process, potentially reducing healthcare costs and enhancing patient comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.