ArticleBJUI compass2024
The accuracy of ultrasensitive PSA in predicting disease progression after radical prostatectomy.
Article in BJUI compass, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognosis of patients with early salvage radiotherapy and low persisting or increasing PSA levels after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. A retrospective comparative analysis.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Erratum.BJUI compass · 2024Article
- The accuracy of ultrasensitive PSA in predicting disease progression after radical prostatectomy.BJUI compass · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2024
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the role of ultrasensitive PSA values (usPSA) after radical prostatectomy in predicting the subsequent biochemical recurrence (BCR). Material and methods: The study included 1836 patients who underwent open or robot-assisted RP at Turku University Hospital between 2003 and 2018. Exclusion criteria involved patients with adjuvant treatments and those who did not reach a PSA nadir <0.1 ng/ml, resulting in a final cohort of 1313 patients. The prognostic impact of the optimal usPSA nadir cut-off value 6 months after RP was investigated to predict subsequent BCR for the whole cohort ( Results: In a cohort with a median age of 64, primarily featuring Gleason score 7 prostate cancer. uPSA nadir of 0.01 ng/ml (AUC = 0.80) at the first monitoring post-surgery emerged as the optimal cut-off for identifying subjects at low (80%) or high (20%) risk of BCR within the first 3 years. Beyond this period, uPSA values during the first 3 [(AUC = 0.89; 3-5 years post-surgery) and (AUC = 0.81; beyond 5 years)] and 5 post-surgery years (AUC = 0.85) outperformed uPSA nadir in predicting subsequent BCR. Notably, EAU-defined high-risk patients with low uPSA nadir maintained substantial BCR-free survival. Conclusion: In conclusion, a low usPSA predicts minimal BCR risk over the next 2-3 years post-measurement. Patients with low usPSA can benefit from reduced post-surgery PSA monitoring at 2- to 3-year intervals without compromising outcomes. This strategic approach optimizes resource allocation in busy urological outpatient clinics, especially valuable in publicly reimbursed healthcare systems like Finland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.