Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39539499›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Rhythmic qualities of jazz improvisation predict performer identity and style in source-separated audio recordings.

Huw Cheston, Joshua L Schlichting, Ian Cross, Peter M C Harrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Huw ChestonCentre for Music and Science, University of Cambridge, 11 West Rd, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7891-5532
Joshua L SchlichtingDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8239-5197
Ian CrossCentre for Music and Science, University of Cambridge, 11 West Rd, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2404-7765
Peter M C HarrisonCentre for Music and Science, University of Cambridge, 11 West Rd, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9851-9462

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Great musicians have a unique style and, with training, humans can learn to distinguish between these styles. What differences between performers enable us to make such judgements? We investigate this question by building a machine learning model that predicts performer identity from data extracted automatically from an audio recording. Such a model could be trained on all kinds of musical features, but here we focus specifically on rhythm, which (unlike harmony, melody and timbre) is relevant for any musical instrument. We demonstrate that a supervised learning model trained solely on rhythmic features extracted from 300 recordings of 10 jazz pianists correctly identified the performer in 59% of cases, six times better than chance. The most important features related to a performer's 'feel' (ensemble synchronization) and 'complexity' (information density). Further analysis revealed two clusters of performers, with those in the same cluster sharing similar rhythmic traits, and that the rhythmic style of each musician changed relatively little over the duration of their career. Our findings highlight the possibility that artificial intelligence can perform performer identification tasks normally reserved for experts. Links to each recording and the corresponding predictions are available on an interactive map to support future work in stylometry.

Indexed as

improvisationmachine learningmusic information retrievalperformer identificationstylometry

Identifiers

PMID39539499
PMCPMC11557239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.