ArticleJournal of medicine and life2024
Comparative analysis of osteointegration in photostimulated dental implants: 650-976 nm diode lasers versus growth factors.
Article in Journal of medicine and life, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Investigation of the Effect of Local Melatonin Application on Biomechanic Bone-Implant Connection in Titanium Implants with Different Surface Placed in Rat Tibias.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of photobiomodulation therapy (PBM) and leukocyte plasma-rich fibrin (L-PRF) in enhancing or accelerating osseointegration by promoting dental implant stability. The study included 15 patients lacking posterior mandibular teeth. Each participant received two implants in the mandibular edentulous area at the lower posterior region. The implants on the right side were categorized into three groups: Group A (650 nm laser), Group B (976 nm laser), and Group C with L-PRF (10 implants each). The left side served as the control. L-PRF was applied at the implant base before placement. Laser irradiation was performed on the buccal and lingual sides of the implants. Osseointegration was assessed using the AnyCheck system from Neo-Biotic Company. The Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ), ranging from 0-100, was measured post-operatively and after three months. There was a significant increase in stability after three months, particularly with 650 nm laser photobiomodulation followed by L-PRF application. The differences in ISQ among the three groups were statistically significant. After three months, implant stability was significantly higher both buccally and lingually in Group A, using powers of 75 mW and 100 mW, respectively, compared to the control (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.