ReviewJournal of medicine and life2024
Universal ultrasound screening and early treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a critical review.
Review in Journal of medicine and life, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heterogeneity of the prevalence of congenital hip dislocation in Europe.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Article
- Idiopathic Congenital Dislocation of the Knee: Case Series of Spontaneous Reduction.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Universal Hip Ultrasound Screening in Newborns: A 21-Month Prospective Observational Study in a Spoke Center.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Observational
- Pediatric Voluntary Habitual Hip Dislocation: Clinical Characteristics, Family Dynamics, and Long-Term Outcomes-A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common musculoskeletal disease in infants, and delayed diagnosis can worsen the prognosis. Clinical evidence increasingly supports universal ultrasound (US) screening over selective US screening. The Graf method remains the most widely accepted US technique. Performing an US screening at one month of age seems appropriate as it allows for some hip maturity and early detection, thereby increasing the chances of a favorable outcome. This paper presents an approach to US findings based on the femoral head coverage method. Considering the long-term cost and psychosocial impact of missed DDH cases, universal ultrasound screening appears to be a cost-effective alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.