ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2024
Sex-related differences in the 20-year incidence of CVD and its risk factors: The ATTICA study (2002-2022).
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dementia and Heart Failure Classification Using Optimized Weighted Objective Distance and Blood Biomarker-Based Features.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Dietary Phytochemicals in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Management: A Comprehensive Review.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
- Sex-Based Associations Between Education Level, EAT-Lancet Diet, and 20-Year Cardiovascular Risk: The ATTICA Study (2002-2022).Nutrients · 2025Article
- Prediction of All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes Using Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness and Ankle-Brachial Indices in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Sex-differences in endotoxemia and trimethylamine N-oxide according to the diet and type 2 diabetes status in coronary heart disease patients: from the CORDIOPREV study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine sex-related differences in the long-term (20-year) incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its determinants. Methods: In 2002, 3,042 apparently healthy Greek adults were recruited, and in 2022, the 20-year follow-up was conducted with 2,169 participants, 1,988 of whom had completed CVD assessments. Sex-specific analyses using nested Cox proportional hazards were performed, as well as classification and regression tree (CRT) analysis modeling. Results: Overall, men exhibited higher CVD incidence rates during the 20-year period compared to women; age-adjusted analyses revealed, however, that women displayed higher CVD rates between 55 and 75 years old. CVD mortality and premature mortality were more pronounced in men. Although, CVD presentation in women lagged men, over survival was comparable. Moreover, the CVD risk factors burden was greater in women beyond the age of 35. Clinical risk factors and adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern emerged as the most significant predictors of sex-specific 20-year CVD incidence. Conclusion: This study highlights various sex disparities in CVD, challenging prevailing perceptions that CVD is a men's phenomenon. Tailoring prevention strategies to address sex-specific differences, particularly through lifestyle interventions, could effectively reduce CVD burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.