ArticleHong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT2024
Validity and reliability of the functional test for hemiplegic upper Extremity-Thai version.
Article in Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are very few standard instruments currently available for measuring upper extremity (UE) functions for patients with stroke in Thailand. Objectives: This study aims to examine the concurrent validity, construct validity, and stability reliability of the Functional Test for Hemiplegic Upper Extremity (FTHUE)-Thai version for patients with stroke. Methods: Thirty hemiplegic participants from five community rehabilitation centers in Chiang Mai province and 30 healthy subjects were recruited. The FTHUE-Thai version and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) were the instruments used. Concurrent validity was determined by investigating the relationship between the FTHUE-Thai version and the FMA-UE. Construct validity was investigated by comparing the performance of FTHUE-Thai version between stroke participants and healthy subjects. The stability reliability of the FTHUE-Thai version, which measured the UE function of stroke participants twice in a two-week's period, was also investigated. The statistics used were Spearman's correlation coefficient and the Mann-Whitney test. Results: There were significant correlations between the UE function, as measured by the FTHUE-Thai version, and the arm, and hand sub-scores, as well as the total scores of the FMA-UE ( Conclusion: The FTHUE-Thai version could be a reliable measurement tool for the UE function in stroke patients in the Thai context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.