ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2024
Use of Internal Bracing in Multi-ligamentous Knee Injury Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of internal brace ligament augmentation technique in knee ligament injury: a systematic review.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025Pooled it
- No Difference in Clinical Outcomes Between Concomitant Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Independent Suture Tape Augmentation.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multi-ligament Knee Injuries (MLKI) are often caused by a high-energy impact resulting in dislocation of the knee joint. Given the higher degree of instability associated with these MLKIs, surgical fixation with adjunctive internal bracing and the use of suture augmentation have been proposed with the intention of better restoring knee stability and improving the long-term outcomes of surgery. This systematic review seeks to appraise the current literature in relation to the role of internal bracing in the management of MLKI. Methods: All randomised control trials, observational studies, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies containing patients with multi-ligamentous knee injuries managed with the use of internal bracing or suture tape augmentation were included in this review. The primary outcomes of interest were re-operation and failure rates, with secondary outcomes focussed on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and examination findings of knee stability. Results: 282 studies were identified for screening, 13 of which were suitable for inclusion and five of these had injuries with Schenck grade III or above. Of the studies identified, failure rates ranged from 0 to 13.6%. Lysholm score was the most commonly utilised PROM tool with scores ranging from 61.8 to 95. Stiffness requiring MUA ± adhesiolysis was a common complication identified across studies. Conclusions: The use of internal bracing in Multi-ligament Knee Injuries appears to be as effective as not using an internal bracing technique. The post-operative PROMs and relatively low failure rates reflect promising outcomes for the ongoing use of internal bracing in MLKI. However, further prospective studies directly comparing braced versus non-braced ligamentous repairs are required in order to definitively determine if the use of the internal brace does allow for increased joint stability and early rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.