Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39539324›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2024

How Stable Do Multiligament Knee Reconstructions Become?: An Objective Stability and PROMs Study.

Vikram Arun Mhaskar, Saif Rahamathulla Sayed, Mahesh Hosmanne, Het Patel, Zoheb Hassan Siddiqui, Garima Varshney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vikram Arun MhaskarJMVM Sports Injury Centre, Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, 110016 India.ORCID 0000-0002-4063-496X
Saif Rahamathulla SayedJMVM Sports Injury Centre, Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, 110016 India.
Mahesh HosmanneJMVM Sports Injury Centre, Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, 110016 India.
Het PatelJMVM Sports Injury Centre, Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, 110016 India.
Zoheb Hassan SiddiquiJMVM Sports Injury Centre, Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, 110016 India.
Garima VarshneyJMVM Sports Injury Centre, Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, 110016 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of the Study: Multiligament injuries (MLKI) of the knee mainly result from high-velocity impacts. This study was done to analyse multilgament knee reconstructions done in a single setting at a minimum 12 month follow-up with objective gait, squat, stability and fluoroscopic examination along with PROMs and compare the individual KD categories. Also, the study analyses the difference between < 30- and > 30-year-olds as well as those who had sporting injuries versus RTAs. Methodology: All cruciate ligaments were reconstructed arthroscopically. Collateral ligaments were reconstructed using autografts and fixed with interference screws. All were kept non-weight-bearing for 6 weeks on a brace. ROM exercises were begun at the earliest. Gait analysis, stability, balance, squat analysis and fluoroscopic analysis were used to determine the objective outcomes during follow-ups. PROMs were analysed pre- and postoperatively to document the functional activity of the patient. The analysis of the various parameters with objective measurements of the clinical, functional and patient-reported measures was done to assess the outcome in multiligament knee injury patients. Results: ACL with MCL was the most common presenting multiligament-involved presentation, with KD3 being the most common pattern of injury. The parameters for contact time, step length, ROM at knee and hip on the normal and operated limbs were near normal and same at a minimum 1-year follow-up with a good stability index. The PROMs improved significantly postop. There was no difference in the results of sporting versus non-sporting injuries, those < 30 and > 30 years and between the individual KD groups. Conclusion: The results showed statistically significant improvement in stability and PROMs at follow-up in multiligament reconstructions, but no difference comparing individual KD groups, < 30 and > 30 years age and those injured by RTA s and sporting injuries.

Indexed as

Arthroscopic reconstructionFluoroscopic analysisLigament injuryLigament reconstructionMultiligament reconstructionMultiligament recoveryMultiligament rehabilitationMultiligament sports injuryRehabilitation analysis

Identifiers

PMID39539324
PMCPMC11554948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.