ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
A novel mechanical-laser collaborative intra-row weeding prototype: structural design and optimization, weeding knife simulation and laser weeding experiment.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Review of Robotic Weeding Modalities for Site-Specific Weed Management.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The competition between intra-row weeds and cultivated vegetables for nutrients is a major contributor for crop yield reduction. Compared with manual weeding, intelligent robots can improve the efficiency of weeding operations. Methods: This study proposed a novel mechanical-laser collaborative intra-row weeding device structure. A slider-crank mechanism size optimization algorithm was proposed, and the correctness of the algorithm was verified by ADMAS software. Finally, the crank and link lengths were determined to be 87 mm and 135 mm, respectively. The resistance of triangular weeding knives with different penetration angles and edge angles in the soil was simulated and analyzed using EDEM software. The simulation results show that the triangular weeding knife with a soil penetration angle of 0 ° and an edge angle of 30 ° encountered the least resistance. In addition, weed control experiments with different powers and lasers were conducted using 200 W NIR and 200 W blue lasers. The experimental results show that the time it took for a 50 W blue laser and a 100 W NIR laser to remove small weeds was approximately between 0.3 and 0.4 s, and the time it took for a 50 W blue laser to remove larger weeds was approximately between 0.5 and 0.6 s. The time it took for 75 W and 50 W NIR lasers to remove weeds was more than 1 s. Results: Based on the above research results, a prototype of a mechanical-laser collaborative intra-row weeding device was successfully built. Discussion: This study provides a new idea for the field of intelligent weeding. The simulation and experimental results can provide a reference for the research and development of mechanical weeding and laser weeding equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.