ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
An improved YOLOv8n-IRP model for natural rubber tree tapping surface detection and tapping key point positioning.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aiming at the problem that lightweight algorithm models are difficult to accurately detect and locate tapping surfaces and tapping key points in complex rubber forest environments, this paper proposes an improved YOLOv8n-IRP model based on the YOLOv8n-Pose. First, the receptive field attention mechanism is introduced into the backbone network to enhance the feature extraction ability of the tapping surface. Secondly, the AFPN structure is used to reduce the loss and degradation of the low-level and high-level feature information. Finally, this paper designs a dual-branch key point detection head to improve the screening ability of key point features in the tapping surface. In the detection performance comparison experiment, the YOLOv8n-IRP improves the D_mAP50 and P_mAP50 by 1.4% and 2.3%, respectively, over the original model while achieving an average detection success rate of 87% in the variable illumination test, which demonstrates enhanced robustness. In the positioning performance comparison experiment, the YOLOv8n-IRP achieves an overall better localization performance than YOLOv8n-Pose and YOLOv5n-Pose, realizing an average Euclidean distance error of less than 40 pixels. In summary, YOLOv8n-IRP shows excellent detection and positioning performance, which not only provides a new method for the key point localization of the rubber-tapping robot but also provides technical support for the unmanned rubber-tapping operation of the intelligent rubber-tapping robot.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.