ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Constructing a Classification Model for Cervical Cancer Tumor Tissue and Normal Tissue Based on CT Radiomics.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop an automated classification framework for distinguishing between cervical cancer tumor and normal uterine tissue, leveraging CT images for radiomics feature extraction. We retrospectively analyzed CT images from 117 cervical cancer patients. To distinguish between cancerous and healthy tissue, we segmented gross tumor volume and normal uterine tissue as distinct regions of interest (ROIs) using manual segmentation techniques. Key radiomic parameters were extracted from these ROIs. To bolster model's predictive capability, the data was stratified into train data (70%) and validation data (30%). During feature selection phase, we applied Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression algorithm to identify most relevant features. Subsequently, we built classification models using five state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Decision Tree (DT). Ultimately, the performance of each model was evaluated. Through stringent feature selection process, we identified 18 pivotal radiomic features for classification of cervical cancer and normal uterine tissue. When applied to test data, all five models achieved excellent performance, with area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.8866 to 0.9190 (SVM: 0.9144, RF: 0.9078, KNN: 0.9051, DT: 0.8866, XGBoost: 0.9190), all surpassing threshold of 0.8. In terms of test data, all five models had high sensitivity; accuracy of SVM, RF, and XGBoost models was comparable; and specificity of five models was similar. XGBoost model outperformed the others in terms of diagnostic accuracy, achieving an AUC of 0.8737 (95% CI: 0.8198-0.9277) for train data and 0.9190 (95% CI: 0.8525-0.9854) for test data. Our findings underscore the potential of CT radiomics combined with machine learning algorithms for accurately classifying cervical cancer tumors and normal uterine tissue with high recognition capabilities. This approach holds significant promise for clinical diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.