SynthesisJournal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists2025
Association of edentulism and obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association of edentulism and obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2025Pooled it
- Tooth loss as a factor associated with deterioration of quality and increase in sleep duration: analysis of the 2016-2017 Chilean National Health Survey.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea: The Expanding Role of Dental Sleep Medicine-A Systematic Review of Mandibular Advancement Devices, Treatment Efficacy, and Occlusal Complications.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSleep apnea is a common and underdiagnosed sleep-related breathing disorder. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the scientific evidence regarding the association between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and edentulism.
methodsAn electronic search was conducted through PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Cochrane Library, up to January 2024. A systematic approach was followed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement guidelines. The literature search intended to retrieve all relevant clinical studies about any possible association between OSA and edentulism. Only publications in the English language were selected, and animal studies, in vitro studies, case reports, case series, technique presentation articles, and expert opinions were excluded.
resultsA total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. They were published between 1999 and 2023 and were all clinical studies. These studies examined a possible association between OSA and edentulism and all of them agreed on their positive relation. Tooth loss favors anatomic alterations that deteriorate breathing. The severity of OSA was related to the extent and duration of edentulism. Mean Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) scores in edentulous patients were found to be two to three times higher in comparison to dentate individuals, although the statistical data about it are scarce. No agreement was reached, however, about the use of dentures during sleep time, since the data are controversial.
conclusionThe findings suggest that there is a plausible association between edentulism and OSA. Tooth loss impairs significant anatomic alterations and increases the risk for OSA. However, clinical data are limited and heterogeneous so more clinical studies should be encouraged for more robust conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.