Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39539110›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2024

Phage biocontrol success of bacterial wilt depends on synergistic interactions with resident rhizosphere microbiota.

Sara Franco Ortega, Bryden Fields, Daniel Narino Rojas, Lauri Mikonranta, Matthew Holmes, Andrea L Harper, Ville-Petri Friman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara Franco OrtegaDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8924-464X
Bryden FieldsDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, UK.
Daniel Narino RojasDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8095-1900
Lauri MikonrantaDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, UK.
Matthew HolmesDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, UK.
Andrea L HarperDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, UK.
Ville-Petri FrimanDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, UK.

Funding

UK Research and Innovation BB/T010606/1UKRI, Defra
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phages can successfully be used in vitro and in planta to biocontrol the phytopathogenic Ralstonia solanacearum bacterium-the causal agent of bacterial wilt disease. However, phage biocontrol outcomes are still variable, and it is unclear what causes this. In this study, we assessed the efficiency of four phages in controlled in vitro and in planta experiments in all one- and two-phage combinations. We found that using phages in combination did not improve the phage biocontrol efficiency relative to single phage treatments, while certain phages and their combinations were more effective than the others. High intra-treatment variability in phage efficiency was observed across all phage treatments, which was associated with clear shifts in microbiome composition, a reduction in R. solanacearum and an increase in phage densities. We further identified the bacterial taxa that were associated with these 'shifted' microbiomes and conducted additional plant growth experiments, demonstrating that some of the enriched bacterial species could protect plants from R. solanacearum infections-a pattern which was also observed using partial least squares path modelling (PLS-PM). Together, these results suggest that phages could open niche space for beneficial bacteria by reducing pathogen densities and that variability in phage biocontrol outcomes is rhizosphere microbiome-dependent, which can introduce between-replicate variation, even in controlled greenhouse conditions.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesPlant DiseasesRalstonia solanacearumRhizosphereBiological Control AgentsMicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyBiological Control Agents

Identifiers

PMID39539110
PMCPMC11561305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.