Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39539069›Full record

ArticleJournal of rehabilitation medicine2024

Patient satisfaction with rehabilitation services following traumatic brain injury: a quality registry study.

Camilla G Hovset, Cecilie Røe, Helene L Søberg, Cathrine Brunborg, Eirik Helseth, Nada Andelic, Marit V Forslund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Camilla G HovsetDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. camguren@hotmail.com.
Cecilie RøeDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Helene L SøbergDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Cathrine BrunborgOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Eirik HelsethDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Nada AndelicDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of health and society, University of Oslo, Norway.
Marit V ForslundDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine factors associated with patient satisfaction with rehabilitation services received after traumatic brain injury.

designCross-sectional study. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: Persons with mild to severe traumatic brain injury (n = 1,375) registered in the "Oslo TBI Registry - Rehabilitation" quality register at Oslo University Hospital from 1 January 2018-31 July 2022.

methodsSociodemographics, injury-related variables, patient-reported outcome measures, global functioning, and rehabilitation-related variables were recorded at hospital outpatient visits. The patients reported satisfaction with services received at the outpatient clinic and in primary healthcare at the final follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression models were applied to examine factors associated with patient satisfaction.

resultsOf 316 patients, 83% reported satisfaction with services received at the hospital outpatient clinic. Belief in recovery (odds ratio [OR] = 2.73), shorter time to follow-up (OR = 0.39), and lower symptom burden (OR = 0.96) significantly increased satisfaction. Among 283 patients, 62% reported satisfaction with services in primary healthcare, where belief in recovery (OR = 2.90), shorter time to follow-up (OR = 0.50), higher age (OR = 1.04), and higher number of rehabilitation services received in primary healthcare (OR =  1.32) significantly increased satisfaction.

conclusionAcross service levels, the strongest associated factors for satisfaction were belief in recovery and shorter time to follow-up, suggesting that timely delivery of traumatic brain injury-related specialized services could increase overall satisfaction.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticPatient SatisfactionRegistriesAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPatient Reported Outcome Measures

Identifiers

PMID39539069
PMCPMC11577624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.