Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39539031›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2025

Association mapping and genomic prediction for processing and end-use quality traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Harsimardeep S Gill, Emily Conley, Charlotte Brault, Linda Dykes, Jochum C Wiersma, Katherine Frels, James A Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating reaction norm and fixed effect models for genomic selection of end-use quality in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Harsimardeep S GillDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3067-6912
Emily ConleyDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Charlotte BraultDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Linda DykesUSDA-ARS, Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center, Small Grain and Food Crops Quality Research Unit, Hard Spring and Durum Wheat Quality Laboratory, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.
Jochum C WiersmaDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Katherine FrelsDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
James A AndersonDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4655-6517

Funding

Minnesota Wheat Research & Promotion CouncilUSDA-ARS 3060-43440-014-00DUSDA-ARS 58-5062-3-008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

End-use and processing traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) are crucial for varietal development but are often evaluated only in the advanced stages of the breeding program due to the amount of grain needed and the labor-intensive phenotyping assays. Advances in genomic resources have provided new tools to address the selection for these complex traits earlier in the breeding process. We used association mapping to identify key variants underlying various end-use quality traits and evaluate the usefulness of genomic prediction for these traits in hard red spring wheat from the Northern United States. A panel of 383 advanced breeding lines and cultivars representing the diversity of the University of Minnesota wheat breeding program was genotyped using the Illumina 90K single nucleotide polymorphism array and evaluated in multilocation trials using standard assessments of end-use quality. Sixty-three associations for grain or flour characteristics, mixograph, farinograph, and baking traits were identified. The majority of these associations were mapped in the vicinity of glutenin/gliadin or other known loci. In addition, a putative novel multi-trait association was identified on chromosome 6AL, and candidate gene analysis revealed eight genes of interest. Further, genomic prediction had a high predictive ability (PA) for mixograph and farinograph traits, with PA up to 0.62 and 0.50 in cross-validation and forward prediction, respectively. The deployment of 46 markers from GWAS to predict dough-rheology traits yielded low to moderate PA for various traits. The results of this study suggest that genomic prediction for end-use traits in early generations can be effective for mixograph and farinograph assays but not baking assays.

Indexed as

TriticumChromosomes, PlantCookingEdible GrainFlourGenetic MarkersGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeLinkage DisequilibriumPhenotypeRheologyGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID39539031
PMCPMC11726427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.