ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2024
Management of Melanoma in Elderly Patients over 80 Years.
Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- The Use and Utility of Adjuvant Checkpoint Inhibitors in Elderly Patients with Melanoma: A Single Institution Experience.Cancers · 2026Article
- Cutaneous Melanoma in the Context of Aging.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Melanoma is a malignant tumour with a poorer prognosis in stage III and IV patients. Development of effective therapies for the treatment of advanced melanoma has led to an improvement in survival. Furthermore, the French population is ageing, and treatment of melanoma in this population has several specific limitations. This descriptive, retrospective, single-centre study collected data on the diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with melanoma of Breslow ≥ 1 mm or of unknown primary and metastatic spread, at Limoges University Hospital, between 2018 and 2022, and compared the results obtained between 2 groups: under 80 and over 80 years of age; 344 patients were included. The extension work-up was more frequently complete and the sentinel lymph node technique more frequently performed in patients under 80. Wide excision was more frequently in accordance with guidelines in patients over 80. Adjuvant or first-line metastatic treat-ment was more frequently instituted in patients under 80, but no difference was found as regards the second and third lines, the frequency of adverse events, and the reason for stopping treatment. Our study supports similar management of elderly and young subjects, given the safety profile and efficacy of treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.