Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39538342›Full record

SynthesisClinical epigenetics2024

DNA methylation biomarkers and myopia: a multi-omics study integrating GWAS, mQTL and eQTL data.

Xing-Xuan Dong, Dong-Ling Chen, Hui-Min Chen, Dan-Lin Li, Dan-Ning Hu, Carla Lanca, Andrzej Grzybowski, Chen-Wei Pan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical epigenetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Jiangtang Decoction for Type 2 Diabetes and NAFLD: Integrative AnalysisEndocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xing-Xuan DongSchool of Public Health, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Dong-Ling ChenSchool of Public Health, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Hui-Min ChenSchool of Public Health, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Dan-Lin LiSchool of Public Health, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Dan-Ning HuNew York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA.
Carla LancaDivision of Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Andrzej GrzybowskiInstitute for Research in Ophthalmology, Foundation for Ophthalmology Development, Poznan, Poland.
Chen-Wei PanSchool of Public Health, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. pcwonly@gmail.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82122059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to identify DNA methylation biomarkers associated with myopia using summary-data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR).

methodsA systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases was conducted up to March 27, 2024. SMR analyses were performed to integrate genome-wide association study (GWAS) with methylation quantitative trait loci (mQTL) and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) studies. The heterogeneity in the dependent instrument (HEIDI) test was utilized to distinguish pleiotropic associations from linkage disequilibrium.

resultsThe systematic review identified 26 DNA methylation biomarkers in five studies, with no overlap observed among those identified by different studies. After integrating GWAS with multi-omics data of mQTL and eQTL, six genes were significantly associated with myopia: PRMT6 (cg00944433 and cg15468180), SH3YL1 (cg03299269, cg11361895, and cg13354988), ZKSCAN4 (cg01192291), GATS (cg17830204), NPAT (cg04826772), and UBE2I (cg03545757 and cg08025960).

conclusionsWe identified six methylation biomarkers associated with the risk of myopia that may be helpful to elucidate the etiology mechanisms of myopia. Further experimental validation studies are required to corroborate these findings.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGenome-Wide Association StudyMendelian Randomization AnalysisMyopiaQuantitative Trait LociBiomarkersGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansLinkage DisequilibriumMultiomicsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideBiomarkersBiomarkerDNA methylationMendelian randomizationMulti-omicsMyopia

Identifiers

PMID39538342
PMCPMC11562087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.