Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39538339›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2024

pVACview: an interactive visualization tool for efficient neoantigen prioritization and selection.

Huiming Xia, My H Hoang, Evelyn Schmidt, Susanna Kiwala, Joshua McMichael, Zachary L Skidmore, Bryan Fisk, Jonathan J Song, Jasreet Hundal, Thomas Mooney and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Automating neoantigen selection for personalized cancer vaccine design.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Huiming XiaDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
My H HoangDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Evelyn SchmidtDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Susanna KiwalaDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Joshua McMichaelMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Zachary L SkidmoreDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Bryan FiskDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jonathan J SongDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jasreet HundalMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Thomas MooneyMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jason R WalkerMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
S Peter GoedegebuureDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Christopher A MillerDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
William E GillandersDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Obi L GriffithDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. obigriffith@wustl.edu.
Malachi GriffithDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. mgriffit@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6388-446X

Funding

Targeting the Bone Marrow Microenvironment In Acute Lymphocytic LeukemiaP50CA171963 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel C Link · 2013 to 2026
$31.6M
Informatics tools for identification, prioritization and clinical application of neoantigensU01CA248235 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFITH, MALACHI · 2020 to 2022
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA171963NCI NIH HHS U01 CA248235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoantigen-targeting therapies including personalized vaccines have shown promise in the treatment of cancers, particularly when used in combination with checkpoint blockade therapy. At least 100 clinical trials involving these therapies have been initiated globally. Accurate identification and prioritization of neoantigens is crucial for designing these trials, predicting treatment response, and understanding mechanisms of resistance. With the advent of massively parallel DNA and RNA sequencing technologies, it is now possible to computationally predict neoantigens based on patient-specific variant information. However, numerous factors must be considered when prioritizing neoantigens for use in personalized therapies. Complexities such as alternative transcript annotations, various binding, presentation and immunogenicity prediction algorithms, and variable peptide lengths/registers all potentially impact the neoantigen selection process. There has been a rapid development of computational tools that attempt to account for these complexities. While these tools generate numerous algorithmic predictions for neoantigen characterization, results from these pipelines are difficult to navigate and require extensive knowledge of the underlying tools for accurate interpretation. This often leads to over-simplification of pipeline outputs to make them tractable, for example, limiting prediction to a single RNA isoform or only summarizing the top ranked of many possible peptide candidates. In addition to variant detection, gene expression, and predicted peptide binding affinities, recent studies have also demonstrated the importance of mutation location, allele-specific anchor locations, and variation of T-cell response to long versus short peptides. Due to the intricate nature and number of salient neoantigen features, presenting all relevant information to facilitate candidate selection for downstream applications is a difficult challenge that current tools fail to address.

resultsWe have created pVACview, the first interactive tool designed to aid in the prioritization and selection of neoantigen candidates for personalized neoantigen therapies including cancer vaccines. pVACview has a user-friendly and intuitive interface where users can upload, explore, select, and export their neoantigen candidates. The tool allows users to visualize candidates at multiple levels of detail including variant, transcript, peptide, and algorithm prediction information.

conclusionspVACview will allow researchers to analyze and prioritize neoantigen candidates with greater efficiency and accuracy in basic and translational settings. The application is available as part of the pVACtools software at pvactools.org and as an online server at pvacview.org.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmSoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyHumansNeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer immunotherapyData visualizationNeoantigenPipelinePrioritizationVaccine design

Identifiers

PMID39538339
PMCPMC11562694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.