ArticleGenome medicine2024
pVACview: an interactive visualization tool for efficient neoantigen prioritization and selection.
Article in Genome medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personalized mRNA Neoantigen Vaccines in Cancer: Linking Precision Antigen Selection, Immune Remodeling, and Checkpoint Blockade.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Automating neoantigen selection for personalized cancer vaccine design.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- pVACtools v6: A comprehensive suite for neoantigen prediction, visualization, and therapy design.ArXiv · 2026Article
- iPepGen: a modular, immunopeptidogenomic analysis pipeline for discovery, verification, and prioritization of cancer peptide neoantigen candidates.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Mechanistic biomarkers for cancer vaccine development: from cancer cell biology to neoantigen-guided precision immunotherapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Computational identification of B- and T-cell epitopes: a unified task taxonomy and review of databases, datasets, predictive pipelines, and gaps.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- ImmunoNX: a robust bioinformatics workflow to support personalized neoantigen vaccine trials.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Article
- Neoantigen-Driven Immunotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Emerging Strategies and Clinical Potential.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- OmniNeo: a multi-omics pipeline incorporating proteomics and AI selection for neoantigen optimization in tumor immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeoantigen-targeting therapies including personalized vaccines have shown promise in the treatment of cancers, particularly when used in combination with checkpoint blockade therapy. At least 100 clinical trials involving these therapies have been initiated globally. Accurate identification and prioritization of neoantigens is crucial for designing these trials, predicting treatment response, and understanding mechanisms of resistance. With the advent of massively parallel DNA and RNA sequencing technologies, it is now possible to computationally predict neoantigens based on patient-specific variant information. However, numerous factors must be considered when prioritizing neoantigens for use in personalized therapies. Complexities such as alternative transcript annotations, various binding, presentation and immunogenicity prediction algorithms, and variable peptide lengths/registers all potentially impact the neoantigen selection process. There has been a rapid development of computational tools that attempt to account for these complexities. While these tools generate numerous algorithmic predictions for neoantigen characterization, results from these pipelines are difficult to navigate and require extensive knowledge of the underlying tools for accurate interpretation. This often leads to over-simplification of pipeline outputs to make them tractable, for example, limiting prediction to a single RNA isoform or only summarizing the top ranked of many possible peptide candidates. In addition to variant detection, gene expression, and predicted peptide binding affinities, recent studies have also demonstrated the importance of mutation location, allele-specific anchor locations, and variation of T-cell response to long versus short peptides. Due to the intricate nature and number of salient neoantigen features, presenting all relevant information to facilitate candidate selection for downstream applications is a difficult challenge that current tools fail to address.
resultsWe have created pVACview, the first interactive tool designed to aid in the prioritization and selection of neoantigen candidates for personalized neoantigen therapies including cancer vaccines. pVACview has a user-friendly and intuitive interface where users can upload, explore, select, and export their neoantigen candidates. The tool allows users to visualize candidates at multiple levels of detail including variant, transcript, peptide, and algorithm prediction information.
conclusionspVACview will allow researchers to analyze and prioritize neoantigen candidates with greater efficiency and accuracy in basic and translational settings. The application is available as part of the pVACtools software at pvactools.org and as an online server at pvacview.org.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.