Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39538331›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2024

Neoantigen DNA vaccines are safe, feasible, and induce neoantigen-specific immune responses in triple-negative breast cancer patients.

Xiuli Zhang, S Peter Goedegebuure, Michael Y Chen, Rashmi Mishra, Felicia Zhang, Yik Yeung Yu, Kartik Singhal, Lijin Li, Feng Gao, Nancy B Myers and 23 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02348320 (A Phase 1 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Personalized Polyepitope DNA Vaccine Strategy in Breast Cancer Patients With Persistent Triple-Negative Disease Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02348320 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Personalized Polyepitope DNA Vaccine Strategy in Breast Cancer Patients With Persistent Triple-Negative Disease Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2015 to 2020Enrolled18ConditionsTriple Negative Breast Cancer, Triple-Negative Breast Cancer, Triple Negative Breast NeoplasmsArmsPersonalized polyepitope DNA vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The immunology of human breast cancer.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Automating neoantigen selection for personalized cancer vaccine design.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  13. Personalized Cancer Vaccines in the Clinical Trial Pipeline.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Molecular origin, discovery, validation and application of neoantigens.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Xiuli ZhangDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
S Peter GoedegebuureDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Michael Y ChenDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Rashmi MishraDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Felicia ZhangDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Yik Yeung YuDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Kartik SinghalDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Lijin LiDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Feng GaoDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Nancy B MyersDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Tammi VickeryBursky Center for Human Immunology & Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Jasreet HundalMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Michael D McLellanMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Mark A SturmoskiDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Samuel W KimDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Ina ChenDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Jesse T DavidsonDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Narendra V SankpalDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Stephanie MylesThe Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Rama SureshDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Cynthia X MaDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Ademuyiwa FolusoDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Andrea Wang-GillamDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Sherri DaviesDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Ian S HagemannDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Elaine R MardisMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Obi GriffithMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Malachi GriffithMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Christopher A MillerMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Ted H HansenDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Timothy P FlemingDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Robert D SchreiberBursky Center for Human Immunology & Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
William E GillandersDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA. gillandersw@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0465-3071

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AIMEE S JAMES · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY TRAINING GRANTT32CA009621 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN, William E. Gillanders · 1988 to 2026
$12.9M
Targeting Neoantigens in Triple Negative Breast CancerR01CA240983 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GILLANDERS, WILLIAM E., SCHREIBER, ROBERT DAVID · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Informatics tools for identification, prioritization and clinical application of neoantigensU01CA248235 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFITH, MALACHI · 2020 to 2022
$1.3M
Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center Investment Program grant 4035Centene Corporation P19-00559 B101NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS P30-CA091842NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240983NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009621NCI NIH HHS training grant T32 CA009621NCI NIH HHS U01 CA248235Susan G. Komen for the Cure KG111025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoantigen vaccines can induce or enhance highly specific antitumor immune responses with minimal risk of autoimmunity. We have developed a neoantigen DNA vaccine platform capable of efficiently presenting both HLA class I and II epitopes and performed a phase 1 clinical trial in triple-negative breast cancer patients with persistent disease on surgical pathology following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a patient population at high risk of disease recurrence.

methodsExpressed somatic mutations were identified by tumor/normal exome sequencing and tumor RNA sequencing. The pVACtools software suite of neoantigen prediction algorithms was used to identify and prioritize cancer neoantigens and facilitate vaccine design for manufacture in an academic GMP facility. Neoantigen DNA vaccines were administered via electroporation in the adjuvant setting (i.e., following surgical removal of the primary tumor and completion of standard of care therapy). Vaccines were monitored for safety and immune responses via ELISpot, intracellular cytokine production via flow cytometry, and TCR sequencing.

resultsEighteen subjects received three doses of a neoantigen DNA vaccine encoding on average 11 neoantigens per patient (range 4-20). The vaccinations were well tolerated with relatively few adverse events. Neoantigen-specific T cell responses were induced in 14/18 patients as measured by ELISpot and flow cytometry. At a median follow-up of 36 months, recurrence-free survival was 87.5% (95% CI: 72.7-100%) in the cohort of vaccinated patients.

conclusionOur study demonstrates neoantigen DNA vaccines are safe, feasible, and capable of inducing neoantigen-specific immune responses. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02348320.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsVaccines, DNAAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesVaccines, DNAClinical trialDNA VaccineImmune responseNeoantigenPhase ITNBC

Identifiers

PMID39538331
PMCPMC11562513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.