Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39538310›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2024

Impact of fever on the outcome non-anoxic acute brain injury patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Elisa Gouvêa Bogossian, Michele Salvagno, Marco Fiore, Marta Talamonti, Chiara Prezioso, Federica Montanaro, Sara Fratino, Sophie Schuind, Fabio Silvio Taccone

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Improving physiological monitoring and reporting standards in preclinical stroke research.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Nursing management decisions in fever: a mixed-methods approach to understanding.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Fever Inspiration: Precision Engineering for Safe and Systemic Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elisa Gouvêa Bogossian *Department of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. elisagobog@gmail.com.
Michele Salvagno *Department of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Marco FioreDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Marta TalamontiDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Chiara PreziosoDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Federica MontanaroDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Sara FratinoDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Sophie SchuindDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFever is a common condition in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, with an incidence between 30 and 50% in non-neurological ICU patients and up to 70-90% in neurological ICU patients. We aim to perform systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature to assess impact of fever on neurological outcomes and mortality of acute brain injury patients.

methodsWe searched PubMed/Medline, Scopus and Embase databases following the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, and we included both retrospective and prospective observational studies, interventional studies, and randomized clinical trials that had data on body temperature and fever during ICU admission. The primary endpoints were neurological outcome and mortality at any time. Secondary outcomes included: early neurological deterioration, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI, only for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage), large infarct or hemorrhage size, hemorrhagic transformation (only for patients with ischemic stroke). This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020155903).

results180 studies from 14692 records identified after the initial search were included in the final analysis, for a total of 460,825 patients. Fever was associated with an increased probability of unfavorable neurological outcome (pooled OR 2.37 [95% CI 2.08-2.71], I

conclusionFever was associated with poor neurological outcomes and mortality in patients with acute brain injury. Whether normothermia should be targeted in the management of all neuro critically ill patients warrants specific research.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesFeverHumansIntensive Care UnitsOutcomePyrexiaStrokeTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID39538310
PMCPMC11559165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.