Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39538309›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2024

Are we there yet? Closing the gap of prostate cancer presentation disparities in Ireland.

Noa Gordon, Cara Dooley, Áine Murphy, Sharon Glynn, Linda Sharp, Frank Sullivan, Ray McDermott, William Watson, David Galvin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Noa GordonUCD School of Medicine and UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. noa.gordon1@ucd.ie.
Cara DooleyUCD School of Medicine and UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Áine MurphyUCD School of Medicine and UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Sharon GlynnUniversity of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Linda SharpNewcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Frank SullivanUniversity of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Ray McDermottSt Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
William WatsonUCD School of Medicine and UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
David GalvinUCD School of Medicine and UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Irish Prostate Cancer Outcomes Research (IPCOR) Study collected longitudinal data on men newly diagnosed with Prostate Cancer (PC). Understanding the nuances of disease presentation is essential, considering the high incidence of PC in Ireland. This study aims to characterise disease presentation features, identify factors related to socio demographic disparities in presentation following opportunistic screening, and shed light on potential inequality challenges within Ireland's healthcare structure.

methodsData were collected on demographics, diagnosis, and treatment of 6,816 men newly diagnosed with PC across 16 hospitals in the Republic of Ireland from February 2016 to January 2020. A complete case analysis was carried out, complemented by a sensitivity analysis for addressing sites with high rates of missing values. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to examine the association between various predictor variables and the initial presentation to the urology clinic subsequent to opportunistic screening.

resultsA multivariable logistic regression model revealed that the type of hospital was a key determinant in post-opportunistic screening presentation, with patients in public hospitals 45.7% more likely to be presented following screening compared to those in private hospitals. Urban residents were 34% more likely to present following screening than rural ones. Age negatively influenced presentation following screening likelihood, decreasing by 3.4% yearly. DISCUSSION: Our research has highlighted the key features of PC presentation in Ireland, revealing potential inequalities affecting mainly urban populations, middle socioeconomic groups, and individuals with inadequate healthcare coverage. While the differences we observed in various groups may appear subtle and may indicate the success of the Rapid Access Prostate Clinics, they are still significant in pinpointing specific populations that require special attention.

conclusionsBy addressing these nuanced differences in access to healthcare, socioeconomic status, and urban versus rural residence and implementing tailored strategies, we can work towards closing disparity gaps in PC, ultimately leading to improved health outcomes and equity across all population segments.

Indexed as

DisparitiesOpportunistic screeningProstate Cancer

Identifiers

PMID39538309
PMCPMC11562076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.