Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39538276›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2024

Religiosity, perceived family support, and gender disclosure of LGBTQ + medical students in Thailand.

Pakawat Wiwattanaworaset, Papan Vadhanavikkit, Sorawit Wainipitapong, Maytinee Srifuengfung, Awirut Oon-Arom, Mayteewat Chiddaycha, Teeravut Wiwattarangkul

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pakawat WiwattanaworasetDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Papan VadhanavikkitDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, 123 Mitrapap Rd. Nai Muang, Muang, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand. papava@kku.ac.th.
Sorawit WainipitapongDepartment of Psychiatry, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Maytinee SrifuengfungDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Awirut Oon-AromDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Mayteewat ChiddaychaDepartment of Psychiatry, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Teeravut WiwattarangkulDepartment of Psychiatry, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe well-being of LGBTQ + medical students can be influenced by religiosity, family support, and the disclosure of their gender identity or sexual orientation. These factors have frequently been overlooked and warrant further consideration in creating a supportive environment for all students.

methodsThis multicenter study investigated two main outcomes including the differences in religiosity and perceived family support between LGBTQ + and non-LGBTQ + medical students in Thailand, and the gender disclosure to family among LGBTQ + medical students. It was conducted among students from five medical schools across Thailand, using online questionnaires during the academic year 2021-2022. Data were collected on demographic characteristics, religiosity, gender identity/sexual orientation disclosure to family, and perceived family support. Comparisons between groups were conducted using chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

resultsOf the 1,322 participants, 31.2% identified themselves as LGBTQ+, among whom 81.8% were Buddhists. The proportion of non-religious LGBTQ + students was significantly higher (vs. non-LGBTQ+; 15.0% vs. 8.4%, respectively; p = 0.001). However, there was no statistical difference in religiosity between LGBTQ + and non-LGBTQ + students as well as between LGBTQ + subgroups. Although, 74% of LGBTQ + students reported good family support, significantly more LGBTQ + students perceived poor family support (vs. non-LGBTQ+, 7.0% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.002). Regarding the disclosure of gender identity or sexual orientation to the family, the majority of LGBTQ + individuals indicated either a non-disclosure or uncertainty. There were significant associations between perceived family support and the likelihood of disclosing one's identity to family members, as better perceived support was associated with higher disclosure rates.

conclusionsNo statistically significant difference in religiosity was found between LGBTQ + and non-LGBTQ + students. The majority of LGBTQ + medical students reported receiving good family support; however, among those who perceived their family's support to be lacking, there was a greater tendency to conceal their gender identity from their families. For future studies, it is crucial to investigate whether this concealment extends to other spheres of their lives and to assess the potential impact on their well-being, including mental health and quality of life.

Indexed as

Sexual and Gender MinoritiesStudents, MedicalAdultDisclosureFamilyFamily SupportFemaleGender IdentityHumansMaleSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesThailandYoung AdultFamilyGender diversityLGBTQ+Medical studentReligiositySupport

Identifiers

PMID39538276
PMCPMC11562599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.