ArticleBMC cancer2024
NOP10 predicts poor prognosis and promotes pancreatic cancer progression.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis and validation of abnormal signaling pathways and immune cell infiltration characteristics in digestive system cancers based on peroxisome-related genes.Biology direct · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based WGCNA Approach for Developing an Immunogenic Cell Death-Related Hub Gene Signature and Identification of AJM1 as a Prognostic Biomarker in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTelomere shortening and RNA pseudo-uridylation are common features of tumors. NOP10 is a member of the H/ACA snoRNP family, essential for maintaining telomerase activity and RNA pseudouridylation. NOP10 has been indicated to be substantially expressed in tumors such as breast and lung cancers and is associated with poor prognosis. Currently, no investigation exists on NOP10 in pancreatic cancer (PC). This is the first investigation to elucidate the impact on tumorigenesis and prognostic value of NOP10 in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD).
methodNOP10 expression and its survival prognostic significance were analyzed via clinical PAAD data from the TCGA database and NOP10 expression in other tumors from the GEPIA database. Furthermore, the NOP10 expression and survival prognosis in clinical samples were validated by qRT-PCR. In-vitro experiments were carried out to elucidate the impact of NOP10 on the biological function of PC cells.
resultsIt was revealed that NOP10 expression was increased in PC tissues than in the normal pancreatic tissues. High NOP10 expression was markedly linked with poorer prognosis. NOP10 may be involved in focal adhesion, channel activity, cAMP signaling pathway, the interaction of neuroactive ligand-receptor, and cell adhesion molecules cams. NOP10 was associated with the tumour immune microenvironment and drug sensitivity. Down-regulation of NOP10 expression suppressed PC cells' ability to proliferate, migrate, and invade.
conclusionsThis investigation elucidated the prognostic and predictive importance of NOP10 in PAAD and revealed that NOP10 is associated with poor prognostic features, survival prognosis and TIME. Knockdown of NOP10 inhibits the progression of PAAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.