Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39538167›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2024

Development of a robust SNP marker set for genotyping diverse gene bank collections of polyploid roses.

Laurine Patzer, Tim Thomsen, David Wamhoff, Dietmar Frank Schulz, Marcus Linde, Thomas Debener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laurine PatzerInstitute of Plant Genetics, Section Molecular Plant Breeding, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Tim ThomsenInstitute of Plant Genetics, Section Molecular Plant Breeding, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
David WamhoffInstitute of Horticultural Production Systems, Section Woody Plant and Propagation Physiology, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Dietmar Frank SchulzInstitute of Plant Genetics, Section Molecular Plant Breeding, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Marcus LindeInstitute of Plant Genetics, Section Molecular Plant Breeding, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Thomas DebenerInstitute of Plant Genetics, Section Molecular Plant Breeding, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany. debener@genetik.uni-hannover.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to genetic depletion in nature, gene banks play a critical role in the long-term conservation of plant genetic resources and the provision of a wide range of plant genetic diversity for research and breeding programs. Genetic information on accessions facilitates gene bank management and can help to conserve limited resources and to identify taxonomic misclassifications or mislabelling. Here, we developed SNP markers for genotyping 4,187 mostly polyploid rose accessions from large rose collections, including the German Genebank for Roses.

resultsWe filtered SNP marker information from the RhWag68k Axiom SNP array using call rates, uniformity of the four allelic dosage groups and chromosomal position to improve genotyping efficiency. After conversion to individual PACE® markers and further filtering, we selected markers with high discriminatory power. These markers were used to analyse 4,187 accessions with a mean call rate of 91.4%. By combining two evaluation methods, the mean call rate was increased to 95.2%. Additionally, the robustness against the genotypic groups used for calling was evaluated, resulting in a final set of 18 markers. Analyses of 94 pairs of assumed duplicate accessions included as controls revealed unexpected differences for eight pairs, which were confirmed using SSR markers. After removing the duplicates and filtering for accessions that were robustly called with all 18 markers, 141 out of the 1,957 accessions showed unexpected identical marker profiles with at least one other accession in our PACE® and SSR analysis. Given the attractiveness of NGS technologies, 13 SNPs from the marker set were also analysed using amplicon sequencing, with 76% agreement observed between PACE® and amplicon markers.

conclusionsAlthough sampling error cannot be completely excluded, this is an indication that mislabelling occurs in rose collections and that molecular markers may be able to detect these cases. In future applications, our marker set could be used to develop a core reference set of representative accessions, and thus optimise the selection of gene bank accessions.

Indexed as

Genotyping TechniquesPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePolyploidyRosaGenetic MarkersGenotypeGenetic MarkersAmplicon sequencingFluorescence-based competitive allele-specific PCRGene bank managementGenotypingPolyploidRosesSNP

Identifiers

PMID39538167
PMCPMC11562693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.