Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39538158›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Coping strategies for household water insecurity in rural Gambia, mediating factors in the relationship between weather, water and health.

Indira Bose, Robert Dreibelbis, Rosemary Green, Kris A Murray, Omar Ceesay, Sari Kovats

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Indira BoseDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Indira.bose@lshtm.ac.uk.
Robert DreibelbisDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Rosemary GreenCentre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Kris A MurrayCentre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Omar CeesayMedical Research Council Unit The Gambia Unit at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Atlantic Boulevard, Fajara, The Gambia.
Sari KovatsDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRural communities in low- and middle-income countries, such as The Gambia, often experience water insecurity periodically due to climate drivers such as heavy rainfall and reduced rainfall, as well as non-climate drivers such as infrastructural issues and seasonal workloads. When facing these challenges households use a variety of coping mechanisms that could pose a risk to health. We aimed to understand the drivers of water insecurity (climate and non-climate), the behavioural responses to water insecurity and the risks these responses pose to the health of communities in rural Gambia and map these findings onto a conceptual framework.

methodsWe interviewed 46 participants using multiple qualitative methods. This included in-depth interviews and transect walks. A subset of 27 participants took part in three participatory pile-sorting activities. In these activities participants were asked to rank water-related activities, intrahousehold prioritisation of water, and the coping strategies utilised when facing water insecurity.

resultsMultiple strategies were identified that people used to cope with water shortages, including: reductions in hygiene, changes to food consumption, and storing water for long periods. Many of these could inadvertently introduce risks for health. For example, limiting handwashing increases the risk of water-washed diseases. Deprioritising cooking foods such as millet, which is a nutrient-dense staple food, due to the high water requirements during preparation, could impact nutritional status. Additionally, storing water for long periods could erode water quality. Social factors appeared to play an important role in the prioritisation of domestic water-use when faced with water shortages. For example, face-washing was often maintained for social reasons. Health and religion were also key influencing factors. People often tried to protect children from the effects of water insecurity, particularly school-aged children, but given the communal nature of many activities this was not always possible. Many people associated water insecurity with poor health.

conclusionsTo reduce the risks to health, interventions need to address the drivers of water insecurity to reduce the need for these risky coping behaviours. In the short term, the promotion of behavioural adaptations that can help buffer health risks, such as water treatment, may be beneficial.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalRural PopulationWater InsecurityWeatherAdultCoping SkillsFamily CharacteristicsFemaleGambiaHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchWater SupplyYoung AdultCoping strategiesFood insecurityInfectious diseasesSeasonalityThe gambiaWater insecurity

Identifiers

PMID39538158
PMCPMC11562698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.