ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024
Modeling ventilation of patients with interstitial lung disease at rest and exercise: a bench study.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe ventilatory physiopathology of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains poorly understood. We aimed to personalize a mechanical simulator to model healthy and ILD profiles ventilation, and to evaluate the effect of spontaneous breathing on respiratory mechanics at rest and during exercise.
methodsIn a 2-compartment lung simulator (ASL 5000
resultsHealthy and ILD models were validated: maximum differences between real and simulated tidal volume were 5% (96 ml) and 6% (54 ml) at rest and during exercise respectively, considered clinically negligible. When we simulated lung inhomogeneity (compliance in compartment 1 > compartment 2), tidal volume, end-expiratory lung volume, driving pressure and mechanical power increased in compartment 1 and decreased in compartment 2. Driving transpulmonary pressure and dynamic alveolar strain increased in compartment 2 and decreased in compartment 1. Time lag of inspiratory flow between compartments 1 and 2 was positively correlated with a difference of compliance between compartments (r = 0.98, CI95% (0.9106; 0.9962), p < 0.0001).
conclusionIn this bench study, we personalized a mechanical simulator thatmodels the lung inhomogeneity and spontaneous breathing of healthy subjects and ILD patients at rest and during exercise. Our results suggest that lung inhomogeneity could increase lung vulnerability to volo-atelec-trauma mechanisms in ILD. Further physiological studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this vulnerability on acute or chronic ILD worsening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.