ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024
Respiratory tract bacteria distribution and transmission patterns among individuals in close contact.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRespiratory disease outbreaks frequently occur in settings where individuals are in close contact, for example, schools and factories. However, the transmission patterns of oropharyngeal microbiota among healthy individuals living in clusters are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the respiratory tract bacteria distribution and transmission patterns among individuals in close contact.
methodsA total of 36 freshmen from Peking University Medical School participated in the study. We collected pharyngeal swabs on the first day of enrollment, 15, 30, and 60 days after cohabitation. DNA was extracted from the swabs and subjected to high-throughput sequencing to profile the microbial composition. Statistical analyses were performed to assess diversity and significance.
resultsNeisseriaceae, Prevotellaceae, and Streptococcaceae were the most abundant bacterial families detected. Over time, changes were observed in the bacterial communities, with a tendency for increased similarity between dormitory room members. By day 60 of cohabitation, the bacterial communities appeared to be more similar compared to the baseline (prior to cohabitation). The transmission patterns included spreading with colonization, spreading without colonization, and non-spreading. Bacteria belonging to the core genera are most likely to spread and colonize easily.
conclusionThe risk of healthy cohabitants acquiring respiratory pathogens through close contact may be overestimated in epidemiological studies. Therefore, monitoring the spread of core genera that are easily transmitted and colonized is crucial for effective prevention of respiratory pathogen transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.