ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
A mapping-free natural language processing-based technique for sequence search in nanopore long-reads.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in plant salt stress research: from predictive models to multi-omics integration.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn unforeseen situations, such as nuclear power plant's or civilian radiation accidents, there is a need for effective and computationally inexpensive methods to determine the expression level of a selected gene panel, allowing for rough dose estimates in thousands of donors. The new generation in-situ mapper, fast and of low energy consumption, working at the level of single nanopore output, is in demand. We aim to create a sequence identification tool that utilizes natural language processing techniques and ensures a high level of negative predictive value (NPV) compared to the classical approach.
resultsThe training dataset consisted of RNA sequencing data from 6 samples. Multiple natural language processing models were examined, differing in the type of dictionary components (word length, step, context) as well as the encoding length and number of sequences required for algorithm training. The best configuration analyses the entire sequence and uses a word length of 3 base pairs with one-word neighbor on each side. For the considered FDXR gene, the achieved mean balanced accuracy (BACC) was 98.29% and NPV was 99.25%, compared to minimap2's performance in a cross-validation scenario. The next stage focused on exploring the dictionary components and attempting to optimize it, employing statistical techniques as well as those relying on the explainability of the decisions made. Reducing the dictionary from 1024 to 145 changed BACC to 96.49% and the NPV to 98.15%. Obtained model, validated on an external independent genome sequencing dataset, gave NPV of 99.64% for complete and 95.87% for reduced dictionary. The salmon-estimated read counts differed from the classical approach on average by 3.48% for the complete dictionary and by 5.82% for the reduced one.
conclusionsWe conclude that for long Oxford nanopore reads, a natural language processing-based approach can reliably replace classical mapping when there is a need for fast, reliable and energy and computationally efficient targeted mapping of a pre-defined subset of transcripts. The developed model can be easily retrained to identify selected transcripts and/or work with various long-read sequencing techniques. Our results of the study clearly demonstrate the potential of applying techniques known from classical text processing to nucleotide sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.