ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2025
A Model for Understanding Lived Expertise to Support Effective Recruitment of Peer Roles.
Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of the barriers and facilitators to lived experience involvement in mental health services.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring Issues of Culture in Peer Work - A Qualitative Study.Administration and policy in mental health · 2026Article
- The role of lived and living experience in evidence-based decision-making in suicide prevention.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- The Potential Role of Peer Support Workers in General Practice: Perspectives of Consumers, Carers, Peer Support Workers and General Practice Staff.Administration and policy in mental health · 2026Article
- Developing guidelines for supporting employees disclosing suicidal distress while working: a Delphi expert consensus study.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Peer roles have increased within mental health and alcohol and other drug services. However, there is a lack of understanding about the 'lived experience' necessary for success in these roles and how to recruit effectively. This study explores participants' views on the essential knowledge and skills derived from lived experience to inform the design of peer roles and support effective recruitment. This qualitative study involved 132 participants employed across five multi-disciplinary organizations in the United States. Participants represent three cohorts: designated peer workers, management, and colleagues in other roles. Fourteen focus groups and eight individual interviews were conducted, with separate focus groups for peers, colleagues in non-designated roles, and management. Findings indicate essential aspects of lived experience comprise three domains: life-changing or life-shaping individual experiences (including intersectionality); common impacts of adverse experiences, identification as a peer, and understanding and application of the collective peer thinking and values; and ultimately, Lived Expertise, a unique, experientially developed knowledge base and set of skills that can benefit others. The study identifies Lived Expertise as a unique combination of individual and collectively derived experiential knowledge. Understanding what comprises Lived Expertise can guide the design of roles and improve recruitment strategies, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of roles and support for the peer workforce. This study offers a model for understanding Lived Expertise that can be readily applied in developing recruitment materials, including position descriptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39538088What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.