Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39538080›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

Financial toxicity of total cancer care immunotherapy patients and caregivers: impacts of COVID-19 pandemic and inflation.

Irene Liang, Djin L Tay, Anne C Kirchhoff, Garrett Schwanke, Lee Ellington, Maria Pisu, Kathi Mooney

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Irene LiangUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
Djin L TayCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. Djin.Tay@nurs.utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5247-0010
Anne C KirchhoffHuntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Garrett SchwankeCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Lee EllingtonCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Maria PisuDivison of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Kathi MooneyCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.

Funding

Research Collaborative for Family Caregivers of Older AdultsK07AG068185 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ELLINGTON, LEE A · 2020 to 2024
$810k
National Institute of Aging K07AG068185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFinancial toxicity, cancer-treatment-related financial harm, is associated with expensive treatments like immunotherapy. The purpose of this study was to explore financial toxicity among advanced cancer patients receiving immunotherapies and their caregivers and, secondarily, to study how recent inflation and the COVID-19 pandemic impacted these experiences.

methodsAdvanced cancer patients receiving immunotherapies and their caregivers were recruited to participate in semi-structured interviews about supportive care needs from 2022 to 2023. The Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity was collected. Guided by Jones et al.'s cancer financial toxicity model, the content analysis was conducted by two trained coders using NVIVO R1.

resultsSixteen patients and 10 caregivers (including 7 dyads) across 5 states participated in interviews in 2022-2023. Participants averaged 63.43 years (SD = 12.75), and patients received an average of 14.6 months of immunotherapy (SD = 9.415). The majority lived in non-metropolitan areas (67%) and were white (95%). Three theory-driven themes were developed: (1) Sources of Financial Toxicity, (2) Buffers of Financial Toxicity, and (3) Consequences of Financial Toxicity. Inflation was added to financial toxicity for non-metropolitan dwelling participants due to increased prices of gas and accommodation. Social support systems buffered the impact of financial toxicity. Material and psychological impacts of financial toxicity disproportionately affected younger and privately insured participants.

conclusionWhile immunotherapy patients face high medical costs of treatment, the burdens of accessing treatment for people living at a distance from the cancer center can exacerbate financial toxicity. Clinicians and researchers should also consider external financial pressures such as national economic impacts that compound the financial toxicity of treatment.

Indexed as

CaregiversCOVID-19ImmunotherapyNeoplasmsAdultAgedCost of IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCost of illnessEconomic inflationFinancial stressImmunotherapySocial determinants of health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.