Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024
Benefits of applying standardized frameworks to implement psychosocial tools such as the 'My Logbook'.
Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04474678 (A Quality Improvement Project to Implement Psychosocial Care Standards in Clinical Practice in Pediatric Oncology "My Logbook! - I Know my Way Around!"), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Quality Improvement Project to Implement Psychosocial Care Standards in Clinical Practice in Pediatric Oncology "My Logbook! - I Know my Way Around!" ("Mein Logbuch - Ich Kenne Mich Aus!") Development and Evaluation of a Consensus and Evidence Based Psychosocial Therapy Tool in a Preliminary Psychosocial Study on Therapy Optimization.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEvidence-based interventions (EBIs) are essential to improve the well-being and neurocognitive outcomes of pediatric cancer patients; however, considerable barriers hamper the implementation of these tools. The present study assessed health care professionals' (HCP) perceived barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a specific EBI for pediatric oncology in a standardized manner to define effective solutions and practical recommendations.
methodsAn adapted version of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) questionnaire was applied to inquire n = 31 HCPs in pediatric oncology about the five domains of implementation.
resultsWhile most 'intervention characteristics' were considered beneficial for implementation, various aspects of the 'inner' and 'outer setting' were considered problematic. The most prevalent barriers included a shortage in resources, poor integration of EBIs into policies and lacking incentives such as user benefits. Concrete proposed and realized steps to facilitate effective implementation include a patient-focused design and continuous evaluation and adaption of the tool, a detailed EBI user manual and application workshops, as well as regular interdisciplinary meetings to improve communication. Regarding the internal and external settings, involving policy makers, establishing psychosocial care in the insurance system and increasing awareness by sharing evidence are essential steps for improved implementation.
conclusionBased on standardized implementation evaluation, various targeted actions could be defined and implemented to facilitate successful implementation of EBIs in pediatric oncology. The results emphasize that psychosocial care must become an integral part of treatment standards and public health policies to ensure that effective psychosocial interventions for improved wellbeing and neurocognitive skills successfully reach pediatric cancer patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04474678 (July 17th 2020).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.