ArticleArchives of virology2024
Clinical detection of four emerging canine diarrhea-associated viruses and evolutionary analysis of canine kobuvirus.
Article in Archives of virology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, a multiplex PCR method was developed for the detection of four diarrhea-associated viruses of canines, including canine bocavirus (CBoV), canine circovirus (CCV), torque teno canis virus (TTCV), and canine kobuvirus (CKV). Four pairs of compatible primers, one specific for each virus, were designed based on conserved sequences. After optimization of parameters such as primer concentration and annealing temperature in single and multiple amplifications, four specific fragments were amplified simultaneously with high sensitivity and specificity in one PCR reaction. The fragments amplified were 165 bp (CBoV), 345 bp (CCV), 506 bp (TTCV), and 666 bp (CKV) in length. The sensitivity of this one-step multiplex PCR is about 10 times lower than that of regular singleplex PCR. There was no cross-reaction with the canine pathogens canine parvovirus (CPV), canine distemper virus (CDV), or canine coronavirus (CCoV). Testing of canine fecal samples from China using the multiplex PCR assay revealed the presence of CBoV, CCV, TTCV, and CKV in 10.1%, 6.2%, 2.8%, and 1.7% of the samples, respectively. The results of multiplex PCR agreed with the singleplex PCR results with a coincidence rate of 100%. In addition, the complete genome sequences of the viruses in three CKV-positive samples were determined and found to be 95.7 - 96.6% identical to the reference strain US-PC0082 and genetically more distant from other animal kobuvirus. The multiplex PCR method established in this study is convenient, with high specificity and sensitivity, which will be helpful for the rapid differential diagnosis of CBoV, CCV, TTCV, and CKV infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39538063What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.